<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Audience Talks Back</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/28/the-audience-talks-back/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/28/the-audience-talks-back/</link>
	<description>Helping improve your annual meetings, conferences &#38; education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:13:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Midcourse Corrections » Blog Archive » The Audience Talks Back -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/28/the-audience-talks-back/comment-page-1/#comment-3026</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Midcourse Corrections » Blog Archive » The Audience Talks Back -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 23:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1457#comment-3026</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeff Hurt, Jeff Hurt, Maddie Grant, Mel Aclaro, Samuel Jay Smith and others. Samuel Jay Smith said: The Audience Talks Back http://ow.ly/11L3L by @jeffhurt #eventprofs #mpi [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeff Hurt, Jeff Hurt, Maddie Grant, Mel Aclaro, Samuel Jay Smith and others. Samuel Jay Smith said: The Audience Talks Back <a href="http://ow.ly/11L3L" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/11L3L</a> by @jeffhurt #eventprofs #mpi [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/28/the-audience-talks-back/comment-page-1/#comment-3023</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 12:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1457#comment-3023</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by maddiegrant: The Audience Talks Back http://j.mp/cQa0PF...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by maddiegrant: The Audience Talks Back <a href="http://j.mp/cQa0PF.." rel="nofollow">http://j.mp/cQa0PF..</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hurt</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/28/the-audience-talks-back/comment-page-1/#comment-3014</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 22:23:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1457#comment-3014</guid>
		<description>@Ranelle
Great suggestions. Thanks for sharing those.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Ranelle<br />
Great suggestions. Thanks for sharing those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ranelle</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/28/the-audience-talks-back/comment-page-1/#comment-3006</link>
		<dc:creator>Ranelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1457#comment-3006</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ve had an interesting discussion via Twitter at #TK10 (ASTD TechKnowledge). The question was &quot;If you leave a conference session because it is bad, should you tweet about it?&quot; Consensus seemed to be &quot;yes&quot; as long as there is constructive criticism and not rude comments. It was also stated you should be sure to include those same comments on the formal evaluation of the session and/or conference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ve had an interesting discussion via Twitter at #TK10 (ASTD TechKnowledge). The question was &#8220;If you leave a conference session because it is bad, should you tweet about it?&#8221; Consensus seemed to be &#8220;yes&#8221; as long as there is constructive criticism and not rude comments. It was also stated you should be sure to include those same comments on the formal evaluation of the session and/or conference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hurt</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/28/the-audience-talks-back/comment-page-1/#comment-3005</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 15:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1457#comment-3005</guid>
		<description>Thanks for clarifying. I have a different perspective on this. 

There&#039;s a lot of education and brain research stating that people must do something with the information they are learning in order to retain it. And that means that during a presentation they must do something immediately with that information or it&#039;s lost. Did you know that 90% of a presentation is lost within 30 days...actually within hours of the presentation. Research shows that the mind looses interest every 10 minutes in a presentation unless there are specific things done by the learner and the presenter. 

John Medina&#039;s book Brain Rules speaks directly to this. For example, people need to repeat information in order for it to go into short term memory. Writing or typing those notes helps in that process. His book also speaks to what some people think is multi-tasking when people write, text or type in a presentation. Very interesting research on how the brain is working with short- and long-term memory and what some people call multitasking--which it isn&#039;t.

We both agree that visuals trump text and that a graphic version will help people retain the information. 

I&#039;m a &quot;both and&quot; kind of guy and believe that both what you propose, and allowing adults to do what works for them when learning including typing, texting, writing, is the best of both worlds. Adults know their own preferences for learning and retaining information.

I leave you with this...just because someone is looking forward at a speaker does not mean they are learning or listening. That&#039;s a fallacy. Listening is actually the worst way to learn and remember something. Just ask John Medina...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clarifying. I have a different perspective on this. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of education and brain research stating that people must do something with the information they are learning in order to retain it. And that means that during a presentation they must do something immediately with that information or it&#8217;s lost. Did you know that 90% of a presentation is lost within 30 days&#8230;actually within hours of the presentation. Research shows that the mind looses interest every 10 minutes in a presentation unless there are specific things done by the learner and the presenter. </p>
<p>John Medina&#8217;s book Brain Rules speaks directly to this. For example, people need to repeat information in order for it to go into short term memory. Writing or typing those notes helps in that process. His book also speaks to what some people think is multi-tasking when people write, text or type in a presentation. Very interesting research on how the brain is working with short- and long-term memory and what some people call multitasking&#8211;which it isn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>We both agree that visuals trump text and that a graphic version will help people retain the information. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m a &#8220;both and&#8221; kind of guy and believe that both what you propose, and allowing adults to do what works for them when learning including typing, texting, writing, is the best of both worlds. Adults know their own preferences for learning and retaining information.</p>
<p>I leave you with this&#8230;just because someone is looking forward at a speaker does not mean they are learning or listening. That&#8217;s a fallacy. Listening is actually the worst way to learn and remember something. Just ask John Medina&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Klein</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/28/the-audience-talks-back/comment-page-1/#comment-3004</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1457#comment-3004</guid>
		<description>Actually, YES! Well, most of the time.

When ever I do a conference/session/meeting, we take notes for the clients/participants so they can focus on the task, concept, strategy at hand. 

We simply provide graphic facilitation and documentation/note taking for them. They can refer back to it at any time- kind of like having the teachers lecture and notes immediately after the class.

Here is how the graphic version works- most people learn and remember more visually- that&#039;s why we do it (plus it&#039;s cool!) 
http://collaborationking.com/graphic-facilitation/

This isn&#039;t to say that there isn&#039;t the right place and time for notes, just that in medium to large group settings, there are options more beneficial than people with their heads facing down in their notepads!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, YES! Well, most of the time.</p>
<p>When ever I do a conference/session/meeting, we take notes for the clients/participants so they can focus on the task, concept, strategy at hand. </p>
<p>We simply provide graphic facilitation and documentation/note taking for them. They can refer back to it at any time- kind of like having the teachers lecture and notes immediately after the class.</p>
<p>Here is how the graphic version works- most people learn and remember more visually- that&#8217;s why we do it (plus it&#8217;s cool!)<br />
<a href="http://collaborationking.com/graphic-facilitation/" rel="nofollow">http://collaborationking.com/graphic-facilitation/</a></p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t to say that there isn&#8217;t the right place and time for notes, just that in medium to large group settings, there are options more beneficial than people with their heads facing down in their notepads!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hurt</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/28/the-audience-talks-back/comment-page-1/#comment-3003</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1457#comment-3003</guid>
		<description>Thanks for sharing your opinion Brandon. It&#039;s good to get a diversity of thought. In your mind, is taking notes during a presentation multi-tasking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your opinion Brandon. It&#8217;s good to get a diversity of thought. In your mind, is taking notes during a presentation multi-tasking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Klein</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/28/the-audience-talks-back/comment-page-1/#comment-3002</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Klein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 14:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1457#comment-3002</guid>
		<description>Another great post about the &#039;back channel&#039; 

Has anyone every read the book &quot;Slack: Getting Past Burnout, Busywork, and the Myth of Total Efficiency&quot;

It says that we can&#039;t multi-task. This back channel approach will never work for getting truly exceptional results. 

There needs to be 2 threads at conferences- maximized personal interaction and collaboration and digital communication and presence. 

They can&#039;t be married together- the human mind just isn&#039;t capable of it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another great post about the &#8216;back channel&#8217; </p>
<p>Has anyone every read the book &#8220;Slack: Getting Past Burnout, Busywork, and the Myth of Total Efficiency&#8221;</p>
<p>It says that we can&#8217;t multi-task. This back channel approach will never work for getting truly exceptional results. </p>
<p>There needs to be 2 threads at conferences- maximized personal interaction and collaboration and digital communication and presence. </p>
<p>They can&#8217;t be married together- the human mind just isn&#8217;t capable of it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

