<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radically Relational: The Social Conference</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/15/radically-relational-the-social-conference/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/15/radically-relational-the-social-conference/</link>
	<description>Helping improve your annual meetings, conferences &#38; education</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 21:32:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Hurt</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/15/radically-relational-the-social-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Hurt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1382#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>@Jessica
Great question. I believe conference organizers must think about more structured networking and peer engagement sessions. Presenters need to talk less, and allow attendees to talk more with each other. One of the simple shifts is for vendors to sponsor specific areas within the event where attendees can go, meet with others and converse with each other. Vendors would also be smart to sponsor specific discussion sessions after a general session for example. If they limit the amount of broadcasting of their messages and allow attendees to talk, those sponsors will get farther.

@Traci - thanks for adding to the discussion. I agree the old model served for a time. Now people want engagement with each other, engagement with the content, engagement with the vendors, engagement with messages. That requires intentional planning on the part of the organizers.

@Kate
Excellent points and thanks for sharing them. I really like your suggestions for new sponsorship ideas and ways to have attendees get involved. 

@Adrain
I&#039;ve not read your book yet and it&#039;s on my &quot;to read&quot; list for sure. Whether it&#039;s a traditional conference of the peer conferences you suggest, both require planning and intentionality. Yes, amazing things can happen when we allow radically relational conferences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jessica<br />
Great question. I believe conference organizers must think about more structured networking and peer engagement sessions. Presenters need to talk less, and allow attendees to talk more with each other. One of the simple shifts is for vendors to sponsor specific areas within the event where attendees can go, meet with others and converse with each other. Vendors would also be smart to sponsor specific discussion sessions after a general session for example. If they limit the amount of broadcasting of their messages and allow attendees to talk, those sponsors will get farther.</p>
<p>@Traci &#8211; thanks for adding to the discussion. I agree the old model served for a time. Now people want engagement with each other, engagement with the content, engagement with the vendors, engagement with messages. That requires intentional planning on the part of the organizers.</p>
<p>@Kate<br />
Excellent points and thanks for sharing them. I really like your suggestions for new sponsorship ideas and ways to have attendees get involved. </p>
<p>@Adrain<br />
I&#8217;ve not read your book yet and it&#8217;s on my &#8220;to read&#8221; list for sure. Whether it&#8217;s a traditional conference of the peer conferences you suggest, both require planning and intentionality. Yes, amazing things can happen when we allow radically relational conferences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Segar</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/15/radically-relational-the-social-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-2820</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Segar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1382#comment-2820</guid>
		<description>Jeff, I couldn&#039;t agree more. As you know, the Conferences That Work approach to conference design that I&#039;ve written about in my book leads precisely to events that support attendee relationships while simultaneously providing the content that participants want.

When we provide sessions that reflect actual participant needs and desires, and real opportunities in the formal conference for attendees to connect and reflect, both individually and as a group - amazing things happen. I&#039;ve been running events like this for eighteen years now, and they are a joy to be a part of; not because of the hard work that goes into organizing each one of them but because I see the &quot;transformative radical relationships and social connections&quot; they generate, and that&#039;s very satisfying to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, I couldn&#8217;t agree more. As you know, the Conferences That Work approach to conference design that I&#8217;ve written about in my book leads precisely to events that support attendee relationships while simultaneously providing the content that participants want.</p>
<p>When we provide sessions that reflect actual participant needs and desires, and real opportunities in the formal conference for attendees to connect and reflect, both individually and as a group &#8211; amazing things happen. I&#8217;ve been running events like this for eighteen years now, and they are a joy to be a part of; not because of the hard work that goes into organizing each one of them but because I see the &#8220;transformative radical relationships and social connections&#8221; they generate, and that&#8217;s very satisfying to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kate mytty</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/15/radically-relational-the-social-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-2819</link>
		<dc:creator>kate mytty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 15:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1382#comment-2819</guid>
		<description>Good point. 

In the past, conferences could get away with focusing only on the information provided. Now, when information is everywhere, conferences are the new connectors. It&#039;s so rare that so many people gather in one place face-to-face -- if conferences can bring them all together, provide valuable information and help them converse, all the better.

That means - as you mentioned Jeff - giving attendees space to go and meet other people. 

Sponsors can help by bringing together different spaces for people to gather. Instead of sponsoring a table -- sponsor a room with coffee gatherings, or perhaps a series of people at the event that are doing interesting things. Use sponsorship to help connect people and highlight what&#039;s interesting. 

Speakers can help by using twitter, socializing at the conference (some speakers only stay on for the main event and leave after), providing a forum for people to interact after the speech, and also highlight the people from the event on your blog/twitter account with photos or videos. Again -- it&#039;s about the audience. 

/ kate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point. </p>
<p>In the past, conferences could get away with focusing only on the information provided. Now, when information is everywhere, conferences are the new connectors. It&#8217;s so rare that so many people gather in one place face-to-face &#8212; if conferences can bring them all together, provide valuable information and help them converse, all the better.</p>
<p>That means &#8211; as you mentioned Jeff &#8211; giving attendees space to go and meet other people. </p>
<p>Sponsors can help by bringing together different spaces for people to gather. Instead of sponsoring a table &#8212; sponsor a room with coffee gatherings, or perhaps a series of people at the event that are doing interesting things. Use sponsorship to help connect people and highlight what&#8217;s interesting. </p>
<p>Speakers can help by using twitter, socializing at the conference (some speakers only stay on for the main event and leave after), providing a forum for people to interact after the speech, and also highlight the people from the event on your blog/twitter account with photos or videos. Again &#8212; it&#8217;s about the audience. </p>
<p>/ kate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/15/radically-relational-the-social-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-2814</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 04:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1382#comment-2814</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeffhurt: Radically Relational: The Social Conference #eventprofs #pcma10 http://ow.ly/WXRR...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jeffhurt: Radically Relational: The Social Conference #eventprofs #pcma10 <a href="http://ow.ly/WXRR" rel="nofollow">http://ow.ly/WXRR</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traci Browne</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/15/radically-relational-the-social-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-2808</link>
		<dc:creator>Traci Browne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:26:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1382#comment-2808</guid>
		<description>Great post Jeff!  There&#039;s been so much talk about how the old model of conferences need to be ditched completely and then recreated.  This is the first I&#039;ve seen that&#039;s talked about what is right and how to improve on that.  

I&#039;ve often come home from a conference that had great information but felt as though I had very little time to actually network and exchange ideas with those present.  The best sessions I&#039;ve been to are where my peers had the opportunity to talk about what worked for them in their organizations.  Adding more dialog is easy to do but requires good moderator skills.  The good news is, this can be taught.  

I&#039;m looking forward to seeing these changes begin to take hold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Jeff!  There&#8217;s been so much talk about how the old model of conferences need to be ditched completely and then recreated.  This is the first I&#8217;ve seen that&#8217;s talked about what is right and how to improve on that.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve often come home from a conference that had great information but felt as though I had very little time to actually network and exchange ideas with those present.  The best sessions I&#8217;ve been to are where my peers had the opportunity to talk about what worked for them in their organizations.  Adding more dialog is easy to do but requires good moderator skills.  The good news is, this can be taught.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing these changes begin to take hold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessica Levin</title>
		<link>http://jeffhurtblog.com/2010/01/15/radically-relational-the-social-conference/comment-page-1/#comment-2807</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica Levin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 14:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jeffhurtblog.com/?p=1382#comment-2807</guid>
		<description>What advice do you have for speakers and sponsors to participate in the paradigm shift?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What advice do you have for speakers and sponsors to participate in the paradigm shift?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

